Skip to Content

Why is price discrimination associated with a pure monopoly?

Price discrimination is associated with a pure monopoly because a pure monopolist is the sole supplier of a good or service, meaning they are not subject to competition and have total control over the price they set.

This allows the monopolist to make higher profits than if there were other firms in the market competing with them, as they are able to charge different prices to different customers based upon their willingness to pay, a practice that would not be allowed in a perfectly competitive market.

For example, a monopolist might choose to offer a lower price to a customer who purchases a large volume of their product, as the additional profit from making this sale is higher than any profit lost from charging that customer a lower price.

Additionally, price discrimination increases the reach of the monopolist, as lower prices can expand demand and allow the monopolist to draw in customers from outside their traditional markets.

What is a monopoly with perfect price discrimination?

Monopoly with perfect price discrimination is an economic market structure where a single firm is the sole producer in a particular industry, meaning there is no meaningful competition from other firms.

In this type of market, the monopolist is able to set prices on a unit-by-unit basis and can thereby capture all available consumer surplus. Specifically, the monopolist is able to make all potential customers pay exactly the maximum amount they are willing to pay for each unit of output.

This dynamic allows the monopolist to set a price on a per-customer basis, instead of having to set a uniform price for everyone. This is different from a monopolist that does not engage in perfect price discrimination, as such a monopolist would leave potential profits on the table by only setting a single price for all.

The implications of perfect price discrimination are significant. First, since all consumers are paying the maximum amount they are willing to pay, the monopolist can increase their total profits significantly relative to a market without perfect price discrimination.

Second, since the monopolist is able to receive all consumer surplus, this reduces the total value in the market relative to a market without perfect price discrimination. Finally, since the monopolist is setting prices on a per-customer basis and thus able to charge higher prices to some customers than others, this dynamic has implications for both equity and efficiency in the market.

What are the characteristics of a pure monopoly?

A pure monopoly is a market structure where there is only one supplier that produces and controls all of the market’s output and generally faces no competition. It is characterized by high barriers to entry, meaning it would be difficult or impossible for a new firm to enter the market and compete with the existing monopolist.

A pure monopoly has strong market power, meaning the monopolist is able to set prices, produce more or less output than desired, and exert control over the quantity and quality of its product. Additionally, pure monopoly firms often have high profits due to the lack of competitors and their significant control over the market.

This can create an inefficient market since the monopolist may charge higher prices than in a competitive market and produce less output than is efficient. Furthermore, in a pure monopoly there is usually nowhere for consumers to turn if they are unhappy with the product or price.

As a result, this can lead to worse economic outcomes for consumers, such as higher prices, fewer choices and lower quality products.

In which type of market price discrimination is not possible?

Price discrimination is not possible in perfectly competitive markets, which are markets where a large number of small buyers and sellers are present, each independent from each other, and all goods and services being offered are perfectly homogenous.

In a perfectly competitive market, any slight variation in price will cause buyers to purchase goods from other sellers, likely resulting in a loss for the seller that increased the price. This means that any price discrimination is rendered impossible, since the seller won’t make any money from it.

What are the conditions required for price discrimination?

For a business to engage in price discrimination, it must meet certain conditions. First, the company must have some degree of market control – meaning that it has enough of a market share to be able to push prices around.

Second, it must have the ability to identify or segment its customers into different groups. Because each group has different demand curves and elasticities, price discrimination requires businesses to differentiate between them.

Finally, there must be an inability for customers to switch from one group to another. This might take the form of physical or legal barriers which stop customers from transferring from one group to another.

In sum, price discrimination requires a business to be able to segment its customers, exploit market control, and prevent customers from trading among groups.

When if ever is price discrimination allowed?

Price discrimination is generally allowed as long as it does not violate any laws or regulations. In the United States, for instance, the Robinson-Patman Act of 1936 prohibits sellers from charging different prices to different purchasers for goods of like grade and quality within certain circumstances, such as when there is no reasonable business justification for doing so or when the price difference adversely affects competition.

That said, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) acknowledges certain legitimate reasons for price differences, such as differences in operational costs. As such, businesses may be allowed to price discriminate in ways that do not create price disparities that are too extensive or uncompetitive.

In addition, certain states have adopted limited price discrimination laws in order to protect consumers and ensure businesses do not engage in unfair trade practices. For example, New York prohibits price discrimination based on a customer’s membership in a certain organization or group and California prohibits offering different prices to customers based on their location.

To sum up, price discrimination is generally allowed as long as it does not violate any applicable laws or regulations. Different states may have different restrictions when it comes to price discrimination, so it is important to be aware of applicable laws and regulations when setting prices for customers.

What is meant by a discriminating monopolist?

A discriminating monopolist is a market structure in which a single firm exercises market power over a product or service and is able to profit by charging different prices for identical goods and services.

This could be based on a variety of factors, such as a customer’s income level, geographical location, or even the time of year. A discriminating monopolist has the ability to rake in excess profits by exploiting market power by charging a higher price to particular groups or demographics.

These prices may not even reflect the costs of expanding or producing the service or good, but rather represent the lack of market regulation or competition to create a bit of a monopoly. This type of firm is illegal in many countries.

The practices of a discriminating monopolist can lead to welfare losses by creating inefficiencies that discourage trade, make resources misallocate, raise prices, and reduce the quality of the product or service.

As a result, the overall benefits of the market are reduced and taken away from both producers and consumers. To combat this, government regulation, legislation, and anti-trust efforts are used to ensure that natural monopolies are properly regulated and that discriminating monopolist activity is prevented.

How a monopolist can increase profits by price discriminating?

Price discrimination can be defined as the practice of charging different prices to different consumers for the same goods or services. Monopolists are capable of price discriminating in order to increase profits because they are the sole supplier of the goods or services in their market.

The most common form of price discrimination by a monopolist is known as first degree price discrimination. This is where the monopolist charges the highest price a customer is willing to pay for a good or service.

By maximizing the price each customer pays, the monopolist is able to maximize its profits.

Another form of price discrimination used by monopolists is known as second degree price discrimination. In this type of discrimination, the seller charges different prices for different levels of the good or service.

For example, a monopolist may charge a higher price for a larger quantity of the good or service. This type of strategy allows the monopolist to capture more money from those buyers who are willing to purchase larger quantities.

A third form of price discrimination used by monopolists is known as third degree price discrimination. This type of strategy is used to divide buyers into different groups, with each group being charged different prices based on their willingness and ability to pay.

By dividing the market into different segments and charging different prices to each segment, the monopolist is able to maximize profits by extracting the most money from each segment.

Overall, a monopolist can increase profits by using price discrimination techniques that allow them to maximize the amount each customer pays for their goods or services. By dividing the market into different segments and charging different prices to each segment, the monopolist can maximize the amount of money it captures from each customer, thus increasing its overall profits.


  1. Types and Examples of Price Discrimination in a Monopoly
  2. Price Discrimination –
  3. Discriminating Monopoly: Definition, How It Works, and Example
  4. What Is Price Discrimination, and How Does It Work?
  5. quiz 9 econ202s Flashcards – Quizlet