Jehovah allowed war as a natural consequence of human imperfection and the misuse of free will. It is a manifestation of the sinful, volatile condition of mankind. Unfortunately, Sin has been present since the creation of the world, and it is the main source of conflict, resulting in wars.
Ultimately, the decision to go to war is a decision made by individuals and not by Jehovah. The Bible admonishes individuals to make just decisions and shows that unjust wars must be opposed and avoided.
At the same time, it also insists on justice and fairness in warfare, and holds conquerors accountable for their actions. Despite the prevalence of war throughout history, Jehovah is not pleased nor does He glory in it, rather He grieves at the devastation it brings.
Jehovah has repeatedly called on humans to seek peace and pursue what is just, so that a just and peaceful world can be established. But until then, war cannot be eradicated, and will continue to exist as a part of this fallen world.
Table of Contents
What does Jehovah say about war?
The Bible speaks extensively on the matter of war, and it is clear that Jehovah has a disdain for it. The Bible speaks of how wars are fought and waged, as well as how they should be avoided, and admonishes believers not to take part or seek personal gain or glory through war.
In Deuteronomy 20:1-4, the Bible makes it clear that those going out to fight are first to make proposals of peace. The Bible also dictates that all neighbors should remain at peace with one another and refrain from provoking hostilities (Romans 12:18).
Further, Jehovah commands that we avoid taking revenge and instead leave it to Him (Romans 12:19). He also warns us against loving warfare (1 Timothy 1:4). Clearly, Jehovah has a distaste for war, and commands us to be peacemakers and do whatever is necessary to promote peace.
Though the Bible speaks of war and its implications, it does so not to condone it, but rather to show that it does not bring ultimate success or satisfaction. God’s will is for us to have peace, and to do so we must take into consideration the bible’s advice.
Do Jehovah Witnesses believe in war?
No, Jehovah’s Witnesses believe that war is wrong and is contrary to the teachings of Jesus Christ, as outlined in the Bible. They believe that true peace can only be achieved through applying the teachings of Jesus in our lives and through obedience to God’s will.
As such, they do not participate in wars and conflicts, either as armed combatants or as members of the armed forces. They also do not serve in the military or salute flags. Jehovah’s Witnesses emphasize peaceful solutions for managing conflicts between countries and individuals.
The worldwide brotherhood of Jehovah’s Witnesses views all human life as precious and condemns the taking of it – even when done so in the name of God or patriotism.
What religion does not go to war?
Generally, the major religions of the world teach the importance of peace, love, and nonviolence. However, some religions are more adamant that war is never the answer than others. Buddhism, Hinduism, and Jainism are philosophies and religions of nonviolence and non-harming.
They reject use of force or coercion and instead teach followers to practice peace and respect for all life. Sikhism, a monotheistic religion with origins in India and Pakistan, also follows a path of peace and nonviolence, and forbids its followers to participate in war.
Quakers, a Christian denomination, are explicitly against violence and war, believing violence should never be used, even in the face of oppression. Oswald Bates, a Quaker who served in World War I, wrote, “If a man comes claiming to have a commission from God to fight, then I dare say his commission is from the devil.
” The Bahá’í Faith also rejects war as an acceptable way to resolve disputes. Bahá’u’lláh, the founder of the Bahá’í Faith, declared that war should be avoided at all costs, except in self-defense. In his writings, he states, “Moreover, strife and conflict sharpens the blade of the oppressor, and weakens the scabbard of the oppressed.
”.
Are Jehovah Witnesses pacifists?
Yes, Jehovah’s Witnesses are pacifists and do not ascribe to violence of any kind. As stated by the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania, they are best known for their neutral stance on political and military affairs.
They refuse to serve in the military and will not vote in elections or serve in any other aspect of politics. Their religious beliefs are firmly rooted in the Bible, which speaks of not taking up arms against another and encourages the practice of peace and goodwill.
Jehovah’s Witnesses are committed to living a life of peaceful integrity, taking Isaiah 2:4 – “And they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more” as their literal guide.
And Psalm 133:1 – “How good and pleasant it is when brothers dwell in unity!” as the key to seeking unity and harmony among all.
Even with all of their commitment to pacifism, Jehovah’s Witnesses still recognize the importance of standing up for justice. They will not however resort to violence as a means of resolution – believing that the power of truth and the power of God will make a real difference in protecting their rights and the rights of others.
What religions are non violent?
Some of the most prominent non-violent religions include Buddhism, Jainism, Hinduism, Sikhism, and Zoroastrianism. Buddhism stresses the importance of non-harming, moderation, and non-attachment to material goods.
Jainism is a religion that promotes non-violence in all aspects of living, including eating a vegetarian diet and not hurting animals. Hinduism is an ancient religion that emphasizes ahimsa, the practice of non-violence against all living things.
Sikhism is based on the teachings of Guru Nanak and it is committed to compassion and non-violence. Lastly, Zoroastrianism is based on the teachings of Zarathustra and it emphasizes kindness, truth, and non-violence as fundamental values.
All of these religions promote peace and tolerance and teach their followers to refrain from violence and aggression.
Who doesnt believe in war?
To some, war brings destruction, pain, and suffering that could have been avoided if more diplomatic means were practiced. These people have adopted a practice of non-violence, believing that dialogue, negotiations, and diplomacy should be used to resolve conflicts peacefully.
Notable figures who have been against war include Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Albert Einstein, Martin Luther King Jr. , and Pope Paul VI. Among these individuals, Gandhi and King were instrumental in leading protests and movements against war and embracing peace as a better means of achieving solutions.
Gandhi’s views on non-violence and war, as expressed in his writings, were instrumental in inspiring the civil rights movement of the 1960s. Similarly, Martin Luther King Jr. was a major proponent of peace, having been influential in combating racial injustice by using non-violent means.
He is remembered for his iconic “I Have a Dream” speech, in which he expresses his desire for peace and equality.
Does Islam forbid war?
No, Islam does not forbid war completely. The Qur’an states that it is allowed to fight in self-defense, to protect people and to protect religion. However, there are strict rules of engagement meant to limit the devastating effects of war.
It is not permissible to kill women, children, the elderly or the sick, to destroy crops and vegetation, to cut down trees, to kill animals, and to disrupt the normal pattern of life. Furthermore, Muslims must use only as much force as is necessary to obtain victory, and no more.
Islam also demands that hostages not be taken, that prisoners of war be treated humanely and released, and that those performing the actions of war remain under the control of religious law. The primary goal of Islam is the establishment of peace, and the Qur’an warns against waging war without just cause or without the intention of achieving a just resolution, and it also warns of the consequent destruction and harm which result from it.
Does Catholicism allow war?
The Catholic Church has a complex relationship with war and the use of violence in general. The Catholic Church embraces the Just War Theory, established by Saint Augustine, to discern whether a war is just or unjust.
Under this theory, a war must fulfill three conditions to be considered just and acceptable to the Church. First, it must be declared by a legitimate authority for a just cause; second, every possible effort must be made to resolve the conflict without violence; and third, the war must remain proportional, meaning the response must be appropriate for the aggression in question.
The Church is not absolutist in its stance on war, recognizing that it may be necessary in some cases for just reasons. Pope John Paul II stated, “The issue of war and peace concerns all of humanity, but states have a special responsibility in this regard, since it is in their hands to promote or obstruct peaceful progress…It must never be forgotten that states owe it to their peoples to remove the occasions of war.
”.
The Church also believes that when war is chosen, it must be waged in such a way that weighs significantly the preservation of human life and dignity as well as the protection of non-combatants and the environment.
War should be a last resort and civilian populations should never be targeted.
Overall, the Catholic Church does have a more nuanced stance on war than simply advocating for pacifism. While war may be justified, it must pass the test of the Just War Theory in order to be accepted under Catholic doctrine.
What is the Hebrew word for war in the Bible?
The Hebrew Bible, or Tanakh, typically uses the Hebrew word מִלְחָמָה (milchamah) when referring to war. This generally translates to ‘battle’ or ‘struggle’ in English. It is used in a variety of contexts, including wars between nations, wars within nations, and reconciliations.
It is often used in conjunction with other Hebrew words such as מִלְחֶמֶת (milchemet) which offers a greater nuance, with connotations of a stronger type of fight or campaign. The word was also used to indicate military campaigns in general, not just wars.
In some cases, it is also used in a figurative sense to refer to spiritual or moral struggles. It also figured prominently in ancient Hebrew poetry.
What is the man of war in Hebrew?
The term “man of war” in Hebrew is represented by the phrase “ish milchamah”. This phrase is derived from the Hebrew Bible and refers to a naval warfare expert who specializes in military strategy and tactics.
This type of individual was generally part of the elite forces of the ancient Israelites, and they would have been responsible for leading naval fleets in battle. The term is also used to describe a certain type of individual or leadership style in contemporary times, usually referring to a leader who utilizes aggressive and often unorthodox tactics to achieve their goals.
Should Christians fight in wars?
The question of whether or not Christians should fight in wars has been a difficult one for theologians to answer over the centuries. It hinges upon the different interpretations of Scripture, as well as looking at a number of ethical and moral considerations.
Generally, most Christians take the view that it is okay to fight in wars, as long as it is done as a last resort and with a pure heart and mind.
In the Old Testament, there were several examples of God’s people engaging in wars, such as the Exodus and the Israelites’ many battles against their enemies. The Bible also speaks of using weapons and armor to protect the innocent.
In the New Testament, we read of Jesus saying, “Do not resist an evil person” (Matthew 5:39). This did not mean that wars should be avoided at all costs. Rather, it meant that we should submit to an unjust ruler, and if forced to, to fight in a just war.
Throughout history, wars have been fought for a variety of reasons, such as defending one’s freedom and nation, restoring peace and justice and protecting the vulnerable from harm. For Christians, there must be a sense of moral obligation and justice in any war that is undertaken.
Christians must strive to fight in just wars to protect the innocent and maintain the highest sense of integrity, honesty, and righteousness.
Ultimately, the decision to fight in wars is a personal one for each Christian, and each individual must seek God’s guidance in making this decision.
Where does the Bible say there is a time for war?
The Bible does not explicitly mention a time for war, but it does have much to say about the use of violence and war, particularly in the Old Testament. Many verses throughout the Old Testament, such as Exodus 15:3, Deuteronomy 20:10-14, and Psalm 144:1, emphasize the fact that God is a God of war and will fight with and for his people.
Throughout the Old Testament, God commands the Israelites to fight various battles against their enemies, like in Numbers 14:43-45 and Judges 3:2. In the New Testament, we see a shift in attitude, where Jesus tells his followers in Matthew 5:38-39 to “turn the other cheek” and to forgive those who treat us unjustly.
This is in line with Jesus’s commandment to “love your enemies. ” We see from this that war is only permissible under certain conditions and should be a last resort. In 1 Timothy 2:1-4 and Romans 13:1-4, we also see commands to be subject to authorities and to live “peaceable and quiet lives” in which violence and war should be avoided.
At the same time, the Bible acknowledges that there are times when war is necessary and even a justifiable part of life, as in Revelation 19:11-21 where the angels of God wage war against the forces of evil.
Ultimately, the Bible does not give the clear cut answer to when war is acceptable and when it is not, but instead provides various teachings on violence and war that should guide our attitudes and choices with regard to conflict and war.
Why were the Canaanites destroyed?
The destruction of the Canaanite people is an episode in ancient history that remains largely contested to this day. Biblical scholars cite the Old Testament as a primary source for why the Canaanites were destroyed, and in particular, the book of Joshua.
The passage implies that the destruction of Canaanite populace is a divine punishment for numerous offenses, including their rebelliousness against the Lord, their patronage of idolatry, and their willingness to assimilate the practices of other nations.
In archaeological studies of the region, there is evidence that the destruction of the Canaanites began as far back as 1300 BC. This destruction has been linked to successive invasions and influxes of people (in particular, the Israelites, who believed God had promised Canaan as their land) into the area.
Consequently, the traditional bronze age culture of the Canaanites gradually disappeared, replaced by a new culture that was heavily influenced by the Israelites.
The destruction of the Canaanites has been interpreted as an example of divine punishment as described in the Bible, a political conquest undertaken by a stronger people, or a combination of both. The debate surrounding this event is complex, and the real reason for the destruction of the Canaanites remains a point of contention amongst scholars.
