Anarchy polyamory is an alternative relationship model based on the principles of non-hierarchical, consensual polyamory. It puts emphasis on creating relationships based on mutual respect, autonomy, communication and consent, rather than traditional approaches to polyamory or monogamy.
This kind of relationship model aims to promote a more equal and empowered way of loving, that doesn’t promote control or ownership over another person’s body or actions.
Anarchy polyamory is a way to break free of mainstream, normalized notions of romantic and sexual relationships, allowing individuals involved to live more freely and authentically. It is likely to involve a more diverse relationship network, rather than a traditional couple/monogamous relationship model.
It also encourages people to explore different types of relationships, without having to feel limited by societal expectations. Anarchy polyamory is about creating intimate relationships based on trust, respect, communication, shared values and consent, in a way that is conscious and intentional.
It is about consciously deciding what works for oneself and for one’s partners.
Table of Contents
What is the difference between relationship anarchy and solo poly?
The main difference between relationship anarchy (RA) and solo polyamory is that relationship anarchy is an approach to non-monogamy, while solo polyamory is a particular type of non-monogamous relationship structure.
At its core, relationship anarchy is based on the idea that all relationships — regardless of whether they’re romantic, sexual, plutonic, or other — should be treated as equals. Relationship anarchists value and prioritize connection, but focus on each relationship individually rather than as part of a hierarchical structure.
This means that, while they may have multiple romantic or sexual partners, they don’t consider any of them to be “primary” or “secondary” to them.
In contrast, solo polyamory is a relationship structure which prioritizes self-sufficiency and autonomy. Solo poly people may be romantically and/or sexually active with multiple partners, but prioritize self-care and don’t actively seek out relationships to fill some perceived “void.
” They are also willing to act as their own source of emotional support, without relying on existing partners for that role. Solo poly people might be relationship anarchists, but not all relationship anarchists are solo poly.
How do you practice relationship anarchy?
Practicing relationship anarchy (RA) involves deliberately letting go of our preconceived notions of how relationships should look and behave, and instead focusing on intentional communication and open dialogue between all parties involved.
It is about being honest and authentic in your interactions with others and finding non-traditional ways of expressing yourself, rather than conforming to societal expectations regarding relationships.
To practice RA, it is important to have an open conversation with each person in your relationships about what works for all of you, as well as any issues or concerns you may have. This conversation should be done respectfully, without judgement, and with a good amount of listening.
Each person should take the time to express their needs, so that the other person can understand and respect them.
It is also important to remember that your needs and desires may change over time, and it is ok to bring that up in your conversations. It may also be useful to create some kind of written agreement or contract between you and your partner(s) that outlines the expectations and boundaries of the relationship.
RA is not one size fits all and it takes practice to develop the skills and knowledge necessary to become a successful relationship anarchist. It is well worth it, however, as it can bring greater trust, understanding and autonomy to all involved.
What is solo poly vs single poly?
Solo poly and single poly refer to two different approaches to polyamory. Solo poly is an approach to polyamory where an individual has multiple romantic relationships but does not live with any of their partners, or form committed relationships with any of them.
This might mean that someone is married to one partner, but is in a relationship with another partner who they meet up with occasionally, without having an exclusive romantic involvement. Single poly is an approach to polyamory where an individual does not participate in committed relationships, or live with their partners, but still has multiple romantic involvements.
This might mean that someone is dating multiple people at the same time, or is in an open relationship with one partner while also engaging in casual encounters. Both solo poly and single poly approaches can involve having multiple partners over the course of time, where the individual chooses to form or not form committed relationships depending on their desires and how they want to manage their romantic life.
Are there different types of poly relationships?
Yes, there are different types of poly relationships. The most common are polyamorous relationships, which involve having multiple romantic and/or sexual partners. This type of relationship allows for a certain level of freedom, as all partners are aware and generally consenting.
Polyfidelity relationships involve a committed core group of two or more partners, and all are expected to be sexually and/or romantically exclusive with each other. In a hierarchy-based relationship, some partners may have a greater degree of power or authority over the others and may demand more of their partner’s time or attention.
Open or swing relationships involve partners who are free to engage in sexual or romantic relationships with other people with their partner’s consent. Finally, various forms of triad relationships are based on having three people mutually involved with each other in a romantic or sexual sense.
Overall, the types of poly relationships are ever-evolving, as different people have different preferences and needs.
How is anarchy in a relationship?
Anarchy in a relationship can be a double-edged sword. On one hand, it can offer a great amount of freedom and autonomy for both parties involved. This can lead to an increase in emotional closeness and intimacy, as both partners are able to express their wants and needs without fear of judgement or rejection.
On the other hand, it can lead to major problems if there is not enough structure and communication in place. Without rules or expectations, there can be a lot of miscommunication, misunderstanding and conflict, which can have a serious impact on the relationship.
It’s important for partners in an anarchic relationship to be honest and open with each other and to create some sort of structure to make sure that both parties are respecting one another and that boundaries are being adhered to.
By doing this, an anarchic relationship can be truly fulfilling for both people involved.
What is the most difficult attachment style in a relationship?
The most difficult attachment style in a relationship is a dismissing attachment style. People with a dismissing attachment may avoid meaningful connections with their partners, which often results in them feeling not being valued and loved by their significant other.
They may find it hard to open up, express their emotions, or rely on the support of their partner. Those with a dismissing attachment can be distant and emotionally unavailable, leading to significant issues in the relationship.
They may also become uncomfortable with physical or emotional intimacy, making it more challenging to emotionally connect and trust. Consequently, the relationship can suffer if their partner is continually denied emotional intimacy and left feeling disconnected.
To overcome these issues, partners must be willing to be patient, understanding, and create an environment where it’s safe for the dismissing partner to open up and share their emotions. Practicing meaningful communication, emotional expression, and being understanding can help the relationship break down walls that have been built so the partners can form a secure attachment again.
What does non-hierarchical polyamory mean?
Non-hierarchical polyamory is a type of polyamorous relationship in which there is no unequal power dynamics, and all of the relationships are of equal importance. This type of polyamory does not involve hierarchical relationships in which one partner has more control or authority than the others.
Metamours may or may not be aware of one another or even meet, but the idea is that there is no hierarchy—every relationship is given equal weight and importance. Non-hierarchical polyamory is sometimes referred to as “solo poly” or “solo polyamory” since it removes the hierarchical structure of other types of polyamorous relationships.
Those choosing this type of polyamory might experience strong and meaningful connections with little to no overlap. They also may not choose to live with their partners or share finances. Non-hierarchical polyamory can be a beneficial type of relationship to those who want to prioritize their personal autonomy while still pursuing multiple relationships.
What is the most common form of polyamory?
The most common form of polyamory is “relationship anarchy”, which is an individual form of ethics and relationship style that views all relationships, including romantic and sexual ones, as unique. The core idea is that everyone has the right to define their own form of relationships, free of preconceived expectations and social norms.
This could involve anything from traditional romantic couplehood, to a series of committed relationships, to occasional dates, and even to non-romantic and non-sexual relationships. Relationship anarchists don’t believe in the hierarchy of partnerships over their individual rights.
This means that people are not expected to prioritize the relationship over their own wants and needs. These relationships are based on consent, communication, and respect between all parties involved.
How does non hierarchy work?
Non-hierarchical organizations, sometimes referred to as flat or horizontal organizations, are based on the idea of everyone in the organization having equal influence, autonomy and power. This is a complete contrast from the concept of traditional hierarchical organizations where power is concentrated at the top of the organization and employees below have minimal influence.
A non-hierarchical organization is organized by an interconnected network of teams, each with members from different backgrounds and skillsets. Each team is self-directed and collaborative, and each has input into the overall decision-making process.
This type of organizational structure encourages creativity and problem-solving, as well as allowing members to experience ownership and responsibility.
In addition, job roles are less distinct and more flexible, giving members the opportunity to participate in tasks outside their own area of expertise. This type of structure reduces barriers to communication and encourages collaboration, as people are able to communicate more freely and easily with one another.
In essence, a non-hierarchical structure allows members to take ownership of decisions and feel like they have input into the direction of the business.
Ultimately, non-hierarchical organizations seek to empower people, reduce stress and enable better collaboration between members. The result is an organization that is more agile, collaborative, and engaged, and that makes better, faster decisions.
What is an example of a hierarchical relationship?
An example of a hierarchical relationship is found in many workplace environments where individuals are assigned different roles that hold different levels of authority and responsibilities. In these environments, there are typically a few people at the top who have the final say and the most authority on all company matters.
These individuals—often executive level leaders—make decisions and dictate policies that everyone else must follow.
Below the executives are roles such as directors and managers, who devise and oversee policies and procedures that all employees in the organization need to adhere to. Underneath the directors and managers are managers, supervisors and team leads who are responsible for assigning tasks, monitoring progress and providing feedback to staff.
Finally, at the bottom of the hierarchy are the employees who have the least authority and responsibility but must follow the commands given by their superiors in order to complete their assigned tasks.
