When it comes to DNA testing, there are a few potential things that could go wrong. Firstly, when samples are handled, especially those from a crime scene, there is always a risk of sample contamination.
This means that DNA from a different source than the one tested could be present in the sample, producing a false result. Similarly, improper storage and handling of samples can also cause a false result.
Another risk is that the sample may be degraded, meaning that the quality of the sample is too low for testing. This can mean that the impression left at a crime scene is too faint or too aged. Another potential issue is that if the sample is too small, it may not be an adequate amount for testing.
In addition, a risk with DNA testing is that it can be inconclusive or produce a false-positive result. This could mean that the DNA tested is similar to the source, yet not identical – creating a false match.
It is important that proper practices are put in place to avoid such results.
Finally, depending on the type of lab testing being done, there may be a risk of laboratory error. Human error is always a risk, which can mean incorrect data entered or incorrect conclusions drawn. This is why it is essential that those responsible for handling and testing samples be well-trained and certified, and appropriate quality control measures are taken.
Table of Contents
What could cause DNA evidence to be unreliable?
First, the sample may not have been collected or stored properly. Improper storage can lead to degradation and contamination of the sample, which can affect the accuracy of the results. Second, the type of analysis used may not always be accurate.
For example, some methods may be more prone to errors, while other types of testing may not always provide enough detail to give clear answers. Finally, variations in the laboratory processes and protocols used can also lead to inaccurate results.
Different labs may use different processes and equipment, which can lead to differences in results. Additionally, certain types of equipment may require regular updating and maintenance. If the machinery isn’t taken care of, then results can be skewed.
In some cases, human error may also play a role. Technicians handling the samples or analyzing the results may make errors that lead to inaccurate results.
Why is DNA evidence considered very reliable What could cause DNA evidence to be unreliable?
DNA evidence is considered very reliable because it is unique and complex. DNA evidence is a type of biological evidence that is considered to be the most accurate and reliable form of evidence used in criminal investigations.
DNA evidence can prove or disprove a person’s involvement in a crime. It is also very difficult to alter or manipulate.
However, there are certain circumstances which can cause DNA evidence to be unreliable. These include contamination of the sample or the crime scene, incorrect sample collection or analysis, incorrect storage of the DNA sample, or a failure to follow protocol in the testing process.
Furthermore, certain environmental factors such as exposure to heat, moisture, and ultraviolet light can cause damage to DNA. Additionally, errors in the laboratory can lead to erroneous results from the DNA analysis.
What are 2 limitations of DNA evidence?
Two limitations of DNA evidence include the fact that it can be prone to contamination, and that it may not always provide enough information to place an individual at a crime scene.
When it comes to contamination, it can be difficult to detect, which likely means a sample may contain someone else’s DNA. Additionally, if the sample is not handled correctly, the risk of contamination is even greater.
Another limitation is that DNA evidence may not always provide enough information to place an individual at a crime scene. For example, DNA may be present at the scene but there could also be other persons’ DNA.
This means that it would be difficult to definitively link a certain individual to the crime scene. Furthermore, if the sample size is too small, the results may not be accurate or reliable.
What are two potential sources of error in DNA testing?
Two potential sources of error in DNA testing are sample contamination and erroneous data interpretation.
Sample contamination can occur if the DNA sample is not handled properly throughout the testing process. This can include failures in the collection, storage and transportation of the sample, as well as improper protocols during the extraction and analysis of the DNA.
If the sample becomes contaminated with other sources of DNA, incorrect results can be generated.
Erroneous data interpretation can also introduce errors into DNA testing results. This type of error is most likely to occur when the results are being interpreted, such as in sequencing or genetic profiling.
If the interpretation is not done correctly, or if the tester does not recognize patterns or patterns correctly, it can lead to incorrect results. In order to limit these types of errors, special protocols must be followed to ensure the accuracy of the interpretation.
Additionally, multiple sets of standards and criteria must be implemented to provide consistent results in the test results.
What factors can destroy DNA samples?
DNA samples can be destroyed by a variety of factors, many of which can be prevented with proper storage of the sample. Temperature is a major factor in the destruction of DNA samples; extreme temperatures, such as those found in freezers and hot rooms, can cause damage to the sample by breaking down the molecular structure.
Similarly, ultraviolet radiation from sunlight, bulbs, and other sources can cause damage to DNA. Finally, exposure to oxidizing agents, like some solvents, and the presence of extraneous chemical compounds can damage DNA.
Although DNA samples can be extremely resilient, any of the above factors could contribute to significant degradation.
How can DNA evidence be destroyed?
DNA evidence can be destroyed through various means, but the most common way is to destroy the samples physically. This can be done by using incinerators to burn the samples, or by using chemical treatments such as bleach or other disinfectants to break down the sample into its molecular components.
Additionally, the use of high temperature and pressure, or microwave irradiation, can also be used to destroy the samples. In rare cases, it is possible to use enzymes in order to degrade the DNA, but the enzymes must be chosen specifically and the concentrations must be highly regulated in order to be effective.
Another way of destroying DNA evidence is through physical manipulation, such as cutting or shredding the sample before disposal. In some cases, the samples may be buried, as long as they are far enough away from any potential digging sites to ensure that they are not discovered.
Regardless of the chosen method, it is important to ensure that the samples are completely gone and not recoverable before disposing.
What is a major potential problem with DNA evidence?
A major potential problem with DNA evidence is that it can be subject to transfer. Transfer occurs when an individual’s DNA gets onto another individual’s body or personal items as a result of coming into contact with them.
This can lead to false evidence if a sample from an unrelated individual is collected and assumed to have been left behind by the suspect. Additionally, DNA evidence can be contaminated or tampered with.
Contamination can occur when personnel in a laboratory fail to properly clean equipment and surfaces, thus introducing unidentifiable genetic material that might be attributed to the suspect. Tampering can occur when someone intentionally alters the evidence to support their desired outcome.
Lastly, the interpretation of DNA data can be complex and requires a high level of expertise, meaning the analyst handling the results must be qualified to properly interpret the results.
