Skip to Content

Which of the following is a characteristic of a single price monopoly?

A single price monopoly is a market structure where a single firm is the sole seller of a product or service, meaning that the firm is the only supplier in the market and faces no competition. This type of market structure is characterized by the single seller having market power and the ability to set a maximum price for the goods or services it provides.

A key characteristic of a single price monopoly is that the market is not competitive, and the single seller is not subject to competition in determining the price of the product or service it supplies.

This enables the single seller to set a higher price than would be the case in a competitive market, where the price is determined by the intersection of supply and demand curves. Another characteristic of a single price monopoly is that there is no incentive for the single seller to lower its price as there is no pressure from competitors.

Additionally, a single price monopoly also does not face any pressure from potential new entrants trying to enter the market as the firm is already established with little to no competition.

What is a single monopoly?

A single monopoly, which is also sometimes referred to as a pure monopoly, is a type of market structure in which there is only one firm that has control of the entire market. This means that there is no competition, and the one firm is the only producer and seller of the good or service.

The firm is able to set the price of the product and has complete control of the entire market, as there is no other competition. This type of monopoly usually occurs when the required inputs for producing the good or service are either very difficult or expensive to obtain, making it difficult for any other firms to enter the market.

As a result, the single firm holds an unfair competitive advantage, allowing it to leverage its market power and make high profits.

Where does a single price monopoly produce?

A single price monopoly produces in a market where there is only one seller and the seller offers just one type of product, at a single price. This type of market structure often arises when a business gains complete control of the resources and the production of a good or service.

A single price monopoly is typically characterized by limited competition and a lack of responsiveness to market demands.

As a result of limited competition and a lack of market responsiveness, a single price monopoly will often provide a lower quality product at a higher price. In addition, the single price may not be flexible, making it difficult to respond to fluctuating demand or new customer preferences.

As such, single price monopolies tend to benefit the seller more than the customer, leaving the customer with limited options and the seller with an uncompetitive advantage.

Which statement is true of a monopoly?

A monopoly is a market structure in which there is only one provider of a good or service. This means that the single company in the market has the power to set prices and determine the quantity of goods and services that are produced, sold, and supplied.

The main characteristic of a monopoly is that the company has no competition in the market, which gives them the ability to charge higher prices without fearing that customers will switch to another company.

In a monopoly market, the company has total control over pricing, output, and even the quality of the goods and services it offers. Other potential competitors are legally prohibited from operating in the market, so customers have no choice but to accept the prices that the monopoly sets.

When comparing a single price monopoly to a perfectly competitive industry with the same costs?

When comparing a single price monopoly to a perfectly competitive industry with the same costs, the monopoly will have higher prices and profits than the perfectly competitive industry. As a monopoly has a higher market power (due to lack of competition), it can charge higher prices, which in turn means the firm can generate higher profits.

This occurs because, due to lack of competition, a monopoly has the market power to set price and output, whereas perfectly competitive firms act as price takers and cannot set price above the market rate.

Furthermore, perfectly competitive firms have no excess profits, so even if they have the same costs, they will not be able to make a profit where they are unable to set the price. In contrast, as a monopoly has price setting power and can restrict the number of competitors, they can generate excess profits by setting prices above the costs incurred.

Ultimately, the differences in market structure causes the monopoly to have higher prices and higher profits than a perfectly competitive industry with the same costs.

What is true when comparing a monopoly to a perfectly competitive firm?

A comparison of a monopoly to a perfectly competitive firm reveals a few important differences. Monopolies have unique advantages not enjoyed by companies in perfect competition. Firstly, monopolies benefit from economies of scale, allowing them to produce goods more efficiently than companies in perfect competition.

Furthermore, monopolies enjoy significant pricing power, allowing them to charge significantly higher prices than firms in perfect competition, resulting in greater profits. Finally, since monopolies have no competition, they are not subject to competition-related costs such as marketing and advertising.

However, monopolies also have some considerable disadvantages. Firstly, innovations are not incentivized in monopolies since they do not need to keep up with their competitors. Secondly, the prices charged by monopolies are often criticized as being unfair, since they lack any competition to help keep prices down.

Additionally, without any competitors, monopolies can be guilty of abusing their market power, leading to outcomes which are detrimental to consumer welfare and society as a whole.

When compared to a perfectly competitive market a single-price monopoly with the same market demand and cost curves will?

A single-price monopoly with the same market demand and cost curves as a perfectly competitive market will generally have lower consumer surplus, higher producer surplus, a higher price, and a lower quantity of output.

This is because a single-price monopoly is able to exploit market power to increase their price and restrict the quantity output, resulting in higher producer surplus. This reduced quantity output, in combination with a higher price, will also lead to decreased consumer surplus.

In a perfectly competitive market, the prices and quantities are determined by the interaction of buyers and sellers, which ensures that no one participant can exploit the market and creates a more equitable and efficient market for buyers and sellers.

When compared to a perfectly competitive industry in a monopoly quizlet?

The difference between a perfectly competitive industry and a monopoly is that a perfectly competitive industry is characterized by many firms producing the same homogeneous product where prices and output are determined by the forces of demand and supply.

And firms have no influence on the market price. On the other hand, a monopoly exists when a single firm controls the entire market for a particular product or service. The monopolist has control over the price and quantity of its output and is free from any competition.

Monopolies also have barriers to entry and exit, meaning that new firms cannot enter the market and existing firms cannot exit. Additionally, the monopolist can set a higher price than if the market were perfectly competitive since the monopolist does not have to compete for customers.

What happens when a perfectly competitive market becomes a monopoly?

When a perfectly competitive market turns into a monopoly, the market is no longer competitive and the usual rules of supply and demand no longer apply. Instead, a single seller or small group of sellers has control over the entire market.

This allows them to set the prices of their goods and services higher than in a competitive market, which decreases the quantity of goods supplied and increases the price of the goods and services. Additionally, monopolies may also limit production or block the availability of certain goods, services, or technologies.

Because these practices lack competition and limit consumer choice, they can have detrimental effects on both the consumer and the economy. Consumers have to pay the higher prices set by the monopoly, while the monopoly has reduced incentives to innovate or invest in new areas.

This lack of innovation can lead to lower productivity and economic growth in the long term.

Is perfect competition more elastic than monopoly?

Yes, perfect competition is generally more elastic than monopoly. Perfect competition is based on the assumption that there are many small firms in a market and none of them can individually influence the market price of a good or service.

Each firm is competing against other firms in the same industry and can be viewed as a price taker. With such a large number of firms producing an identical product, the market demand for that product is more elastic because buyers can easily switch between firms in search of the cheapest price.

On the other hand, in monopoly a single firm is the sole supplier of a particular product. This means that the monopoly has the ability to set the price in the market, so there is less elasticity in the demand.

In essence, buyers have no alternative and have to accept the price set by the monopolist. There is also less demand-side competition, as buyers have fewer alternatives from which to choose. As a result, the demand for a monopolist’s product is inelastic, meaning that the company has less incentive to reduce its prices in response to shifts in the demand for its product.

What does it mean when an industry is perfectly competitive?

When an industry is perfectly competitive, it means that the market is made up of a large number of small firms with identical products and that none of the firms has enough market power to influence prices.

This means that each individual firm has little to no control over the prices in the market due to the fact that they are all essentially equal in market share and the cost of entry into the market is low enough that it will not be able to hold one firm back from entering if they wish to do so.

As such, all the firms in a perfectly competitive market have to accept whatever the market dictates as the price for their product as they will have no power to influence it otherwise. Furthermore, due to the presence of numerous competitors, none of the firms have a lot of control over their profits either because profits will always be limited by the market.

This means that firms in a perfectly competitive industry exist in equilibrium and none of them will be able to make abnormal profits as they are all essentially running in place and no one can gain a competitive advantage over the other firm.

In this sense, a perfectly competitive industry is one that is competitively efficient and the resources in it are being utilized in the best way possible.

Which of the following statements about monopoly and perfect competition is correct?

The answer is that all of the following statements about monopoly and perfect competition are correct:

1. Monopoly is a market structure where one company has absolute control of the market and sets prices for the entire market.

2. Perfect competition is a market structure where a large number of producers compete against each other to produce and sell a product or service.

3. In a monopoly market, the producer can charge a higher price than in a perfect competition market, as they have all of the market power.

4. In a perfect competition market, competition keeps prices at an efficient level that is lower than in a monopoly market.

5. In a monopoly market, the producer can choose which consumers he or she sells to, whereas in a perfect competition market, all consumers are eligible to buy a product.

6. Monopoly has large economic profits, while perfect competition has low profits, as competition keeps prices low.

Does perfect competition lead to allocative and productive efficiency?

Yes, perfect competition can lead to both allocative and productive efficiency. Allocative efficiency occurs when the market allocates resources efficiently and no one can be made better off without making someone else worse off.

This is achieved when prices equal the marginal cost of production and reflect the market value of the good or service. Productive efficiency occurs when firms produce the desired combination of goods or services using the most economical level of resources.

This is accomplished by producing a good or service at the lowest possible cost per unit. In a perfect competition market, firms are price takers, meaning firms are unable to set their own prices for goods and services and have to accept the market price.

This encourages firms to produce the socially optimal level of output, helping them to achieve productive efficiency. Additionally, since all firms in the market in a perfect competition have the same costs and face the same prices, they cannot make economic profits in the long-run.

This elimination of economic rent discourages firms from exercising market power, thus leading to allocative efficiency. Overall, able to produce goods and services at the lowest cost, while simultaneously charging the market price for their goods and services, the firms in perfect competition are able to achieve both allocative and productive efficiency.

What is the difference between perfect competition and monopolistic competition?

Perfect competition and monopolistic competition are two widely studied and distinct market structures that are characterized by a distinct set of characteristics.

In perfect competition, the product being sold is homogeneous, meaning that all products offered in the market are identical. Thus, no firm has an advantage over the others, allowing for complete unification of the market price.

All firms are price takers, meaning they must accept the given market price and efforts to increase prices will be met by replacement by other firms. Therefore, the characteristic of perfect competition is that no firm has any influence or control over price or production, and competition between firms is price-based.

In contrast, monopolistic competition is characterized by substantial heterogeneous or differentiated products, meaning each firm is offering a unique product or service with slight differences from that of its competitors.

Therefore, each firm in the market has some degree of market power, and is able to set their own price due to a degree of brand loyalty from the consumers. Additionally, firms within monopolistic competition exist in large numbers and, unlike perfect competition, there is a significant presence of non-price competition through advertising.

Lastly, there is no long-run equilibrium where profits are maximized for the firms, instead firms are content with achieving normal profits in the long run since entry and exit from the market can occur.

In summary, the main difference between perfect competition and monopolistic competition is that in perfect competition, the product is homogeneous, whereas in monopolistic competition, the product is heterogeneous and there is a degree of market power.

Additionally, in perfect competition, firms are price takers and adhere to the market price, while in monopolistic competition, the market power of each firm allows them to set their own prices. Last, there is no long-run equilibrium in monopolistic competition, while perfect competition has a long-run equilibrium of zero economic profits.

When a monopoly is maximizing its profits quizlet?

When a monopoly is maximizing its profits, it is seeking to obtain the most amount of revenue that it can through whatever pricing strategies or tactics it has at its disposal. Monopolies have extensive market power and can exercise this power to influence prices and increase profits.

Maximizing profits requires a firm to recognize its market power and use it to control the market. Additionally, maximizing profits requires a firm to focus on its cost structure. When a monopoly decreases its costs, it can charge a higher price and increase its overall revenue.

Monopolies also need to recognize their competitive advantages, such as scarcity of goods and services, and use these advantages to charge a higher price, thus increasing profits. Lastly, monopolies may utilize strategies such as price discrimination and price skimming to increase their profits by charging different prices to different consumers.