The conflict in Ukraine between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian government forces has taken a significant toll on both sides. The Russian military has been accused of providing support to the separatists, including sending in reinforcements and providing supplies and weaponry.
While there is no exact number of Russian planes that have been lost in Ukraine, there have been numerous reports of Russian military planes being shot down over Ukrainian territory. In July 2014, a Malaysian Airlines flight was shot down over the conflict zone, killing all 298 people on board. The Ukrainian government and many western countries blame the incident on a Russian missile fired by separatist fighters.
In addition to the downing of civilian airplanes, there have been reports of Russian military planes being shot down or crashing in Ukraine. In August 2014, a Russian Su-24 fighter jet was reportedly downed by Ukrainian forces near Luhansk. In July 2015, a Russian helicopter crashed near the Ukrainian border, killing one crew member.
Some sources estimate that as many as 17 Russian planes have been lost in Ukraine since the start of the conflict in 2014. However, it is difficult to verify these reports as the Russian government has denied any direct involvement in the conflict and has not formally acknowledged any losses. The true number of Russian planes lost in Ukraine may never be known.
Table of Contents
How many tanks does Russia have left?
I do not have the capability to access real-time information or current events. Therefore, my response to the question regarding the number of tanks that Russia has left will be purely hypothetical.
Firstly, it is important to understand that Russia’s military arsenal is considered to be one of the largest in the world. The country is known for its heavy investment in the development and manufacturing of advanced military technology, which includes tanks, air force equipment, and submarines, among others.
In terms of tanks, Russia has several types that are currently being used in their military operations. Some of these tanks include the T-14 Armata, T-80, T-90, and the T-72B3. According to various sources, Russia is said to have over 20,000 tanks in its arsenal, which includes both active and reserve tanks.
However, it’s important to note that this figure may vary depending on the source and may not be accurate.
In recent years, Russia has been investing heavily in modernizing its military and upgrading its arsenal. This includes plans to replace their old tanks with new, advanced models. For instance, the T-14 Armata is considered to be one of the most advanced tanks in the world, and it is expected to replace the older T-72 models.
According to reports, Russia plans to have around 2,300 T-14s in its arsenal by 2025.
Based on the available information, Russia is believed to have over 20,000 tanks in its arsenal, which could be a combination of active and reserve tanks. However, it’s important to note that this number may not be accurate, and it may not reflect the current state of their military arsenal. Additionally, Russia is continuously investing in modernizing its military and upgrading its arsenal with advanced models, such as the T-14 Armata, which may change the number of tanks they have.
What percentage of Russian tanks have been destroyed in Ukraine?
It is difficult to provide an accurate percentage of Russian tanks that have been destroyed in Ukraine due to the lack of transparency from both sides of the conflict. However, it is widely believed by international observers that Russian tanks have played a significant role in the conflict, particularly during the initial stages of the annexation of Crimea and the early days of the Donbass insurgency.
The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) has reported on numerous occasions that they have observed Russian military equipment in the territory controlled by separatist forces in eastern Ukraine. This includes armored vehicles, tanks, and heavy artillery. The OSCE has also documented instances of tank movements across the border from Russia into Ukraine.
In terms of specific numbers, the Ukrainian government has claimed that it has destroyed over a thousand tanks and armored vehicles belonging to Russian-backed separatist forces since the conflict began in 2014. However, it is difficult to confirm these numbers as independent verification is difficult to obtain in the areas controlled by separatist forces.
It is worth noting that Russia denies any direct involvement in the conflict in Ukraine, stating that any Russian military equipment in Ukraine is either captured from the Ukrainian military or belongs to separatist forces who obtained them from Ukrainian stocks.
While it is challenging to provide an exact percentage, it is apparent that Russian tanks have played a significant role in the conflict in Ukraine, and a substantial number of them have been either destroyed or captured by Ukrainian forces.
Is Russia running out of ammunition?
There is no definitive evidence that Russia is running out of ammunition, as there are limited official sources to verify such claims. However, there are some indications that suggest Russia could be facing a potential ammunition shortage.
Firstly, there have been reports of shortages or delays in producing some types of ammunition, such as mortar shells, missile launchers or small-caliber bullets, due to technical or production issues. These shortcomings have reportedly caused some difficulties for Russian military units, particularly in combat situations in Syria and Ukraine, where heavy usage of high-explosive ammunition has led to increased demand.
Moreover, the ongoing economic challenges that Russia is facing, including international sanctions and lower oil prices, have led to a decrease in military spending, which perhaps could impact military operations and ammunition supplies. While the Russian government has tried to mitigate these factors by increasing domestic production and importing ammunition from foreign countries like Serbia, Belarus, or South Africa, it’s still unclear whether these measures will be sufficient to meet Russia’s longstanding demand for military hardware and armaments.
Furthermore, there have been reports of a decrease in conscription rates, and some Russian Army veterans have alleged that in some cases soldiers are not provided with enough ammunition, being obliged to engage in combat with limited supplies. This situation could be particularly problematic in the context of the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine and the recent escalation of tension with Belarus.
While there is no concrete evidence to confirm that Russia is running out of ammunition, there have been some signs that suggest that Russia faces potential challenges in meeting the demand for military hardware, particularly as the country continues to grapple with economic and military challenges.
Nevertheless, Russia has a long and storied history of military production and may be able to address its potential ammunition shortage in the long term.
Are Russians shooting their own soldiers?
The Russian military has been involved in various conflicts in recent years, including the ongoing war in Syria and the conflict in Ukraine. In both these conflicts, there have been reports of Russian soldiers being killed by friendly fire or deliberate shooting by their fellow soldiers or commanders.
In the case of Syria, the Russian military has been supporting the government forces of President Bashar al-Assad against various rebel groups and terrorist organizations. While the Russian military claims to have no boots on the ground, there have been reports of Russian soldiers and mercenaries being deployed in the conflict zone.
In June 2021, it was reported that a Russian soldier was shot and killed by his fellow soldiers while trying to desert from the Syrian warzone.
Similarly, in Ukraine, the Russian military has been accused of backing separatist rebels in the eastern regions of Donetsk and Luhansk. The conflict has claimed thousands of lives, including both Ukrainian soldiers and rebel fighters. There have been several reports of Russian soldiers being killed in the fighting, with some allegations of friendly fire from their own side.
It is important to note that these are unsubstantiated claims and it is difficult to confirm the veracity of these reports. However, if true, it would indicate a breakdown in discipline and chain of command within the Russian military, which could have serious implications for their operations and reputation.
While there are reports and allegations of Russians shooting their own soldiers in various conflicts, it is not possible to confirm their veracity. Nevertheless, it highlights the complexities and risks involved in modern warfare and the importance of maintaining strict discipline and accountability in military operations.
Can you shoot guns in Russia?
Yes, it is legal to shoot guns in Russia. However, there are certain regulations and requirements that must be met in order to possess firearms and utilize them for shooting purposes. These regulations are enforced by the Russian government and are primarily intended to promote safety and prevent crime.
In order to own and use guns in Russia, individuals must first obtain a firearms license. This process involves submitting an application to the local Federal Security Service (FSB) office, which includes providing personal information, a criminal record check, and reasons for wanting to own a firearm.
Additionally, there are specific rules governing what types of guns can be legally owned and operated in Russia. Full-automatic firearms are typically prohibited, while semi-automatic firearms, shotguns, and rifles are more commonly permitted.
While it is legal to own and use firearms in Russia, shooting activities are largely limited to designated areas or shooting ranges. It is illegal to discharge firearms in public areas or without proper supervision.
Gun ownership and shooting are allowed in Russia, but it is important to understand the regulations and requirements involved in order to ensure safety and legality.
What percent of US ammo comes from Russia?
Russia is home to some of the world’s largest ammunition manufacturers, such as TulAmmo, Wolf Performance Ammunition, and Barnaul Ammunition. These companies produce a wide variety of ammunition that is exported to various countries, including the United States.
In recent years, concerns have arisen about the reliance on Russian ammunition in the US market. The US government has imposed various trade restrictions and sanctions on Russia, which have affected the availability and price of Russian-made ammunition in the US. As a result, American ammunition manufacturers have ramped up production to fill the demand.
The exact percentage of US ammo that comes from Russia is difficult to determine, as there is no reliable source that tracks this information. However, it’s safe to say that Russian-made ammunition makes up a significant portion of the US market. The availability and pricing of Russian ammo in the US are affected by various factors, including trade restrictions, sanctions, and global supply and demand.
while the specific percentage of US ammo sourced from Russia may vary, it is clear that Russia remains an important player in the global ammunition industry, supplying a considerable amount of ammunition to the US market.
Why are Russians losing so many tanks?
There could be multiple reasons why Russians are losing so many tanks. One of the primary reasons could be due to the involvement of the Russian military in wars and conflicts in different parts of the world. The military engagements in Ukraine and Syria, for instance, have led to the deployment of Russian tanks in these regions.
These regions are highly volatile, and the Russian military faces significant challenges in maintaining the safety and security of their tanks.
Another reason why Russians are losing so many tanks could be due to the age and outdated technology of their tank fleet. Many of the tanks used by the Russian military are older models that have undergone multiple upgrades but still lack the advanced technology found in more modern tanks used by other countries.
The lack of modern technology has made Russian tanks more susceptible to attacks from enemy forces, leading to a higher rate of loss.
Furthermore, the tactics and strategies employed by the Russian military have contributed to the substantial loss of their tanks. The military relies heavily on its tanks to lead its attacks, making them an easy target for enemy fire. This has led to many tanks being lost due to direct engagement with enemy forces.
Lastly, the lack of proper maintenance, training, and equipment has contributed significantly to the loss of Russian tanks. Many tanks are not properly maintained, leading to breakdowns and other malfunctions, which can result in loss during military engagements. Also, the training provided to Russian tank crews is often inadequate, making them more vulnerable to enemy attacks.
Moreover, many tanks in the Russian military are poorly equipped, leading to a higher loss rate.
The loss of Russian tanks could be attributed to a combination of factors such as the involvement in conflicts, outdated technology, military tactics and strategies, lack of proper maintenance and training, and inadequate equipment. Effective measures must be taken to address these issues to minimize the loss of Russian tanks in the future.
How much military has Russia lost?
There is no definitive answer to the question of how much military has Russia lost, as the country’s military losses have varied widely over time and across different conflicts. Russia has a long and complex history of military engagement, from its early days as the powerful empire of the 19th century to its more recent role as a major player in the modern global military landscape.
One of the most significant military losses in Russian history was the defeat of the Russian empire in World War I, which resulted in both territorial losses and significant casualties. The Russian army suffered heavy losses in battles and campaigns, and many soldiers were killed or captured by enemy forces.
The country’s economic and social infrastructure was also heavily damaged during this period.
During World War II, Russia suffered some of the most devastating losses in its history. The country lost millions of soldiers and civilians, and many cities and towns were destroyed as a result of the conflict. Despite these heavy losses, however, Russia ultimately emerged victorious over the Axis powers.
More recently, Russia has been involved in a number of other conflicts around the world that have resulted in losses for the country’s military. For example, Russia has been involved in the ongoing conflict in Syria, where it has suffered both military and civilian casualties. It has also been engaged in a conflict with Ukraine over the annexation of Crimea, which has resulted in significant losses on both sides.
It is difficult to estimate the total number of military losses that Russia has experienced over time, as these have varied widely depending on the specific conflict and historical period in question. However, it is clear that Russia has faced significant military losses throughout its history, and has often had to rebuild and restructure its military capabilities in order to maintain its global military standing.
Who has the fighter jet in the world?
There are several countries that have fighter jets in the world. The United States, Russia, China, and the United Kingdom are some of the countries that have some of the most advanced fighter jets in the world. The United States, for example, has a wide range of fighter jets including the F-15 Eagle, F-16 Fighting Falcon, F-22 Raptor, and F-35 Lightning II.
Each of these fighter jets has unique capabilities that enable them to perform different missions.
Russia, on the other hand, has several advanced fighter jets including the Su-35, Su-30, and MiG-35. These fighter jets have advanced avionics, stealth capabilities, and precision-guided munitions that enable them to perform a wide range of missions. China has also invested heavily in its defense industry and has developed several fighter jets such as the J-10, J-11, and J-16.
These fighter jets have advanced radar systems, advanced missile systems, and other advanced technologies.
Other countries, including France, India, Israel, and Japan also have advanced fighter jets that are capable of performing a wide range of missions. These fighter jets are used for a variety of purposes including air defense, air superiority, ground attack, and reconnaissance.
Many different countries have invested heavily in developing advanced fighter jets, and the technology continues to evolve. As a result, it is difficult to say which country has the best fighter jet in the world, as each country has its own unique capabilities and advantages. the most effective fighter jet is the one that is best suited to the specific mission it is intended to perform.
Were T 90 tanks destroyed in Ukraine?
The T 90 tank is a modern Russian main battle tank that has been in service since the early 2000s. It has been used in various conflicts and military operations, including the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. While it is difficult to verify the exact number of T 90 tanks destroyed in Ukraine, there is evidence to suggest that they have been targeted and damaged by Ukrainian military forces.
According to media reports and statements by Ukrainian officials, T 90 tanks have been targeted and destroyed in several battles and skirmishes in eastern Ukraine. For example, in August 2014, Ukrainian military officials claimed that they had destroyed two T 90 tanks in a battle near the town of Nyzhnie Krynky.
Similarly, in September 2014, Ukrainian forces announced that they had destroyed three T 90 tanks in a battle near the town of Snizhne.
There have also been reports of T 90 tanks being targeted and damaged by Ukrainian artillery and anti-tank weapons. For instance, in February 2015, Ukrainian officials claimed that their troops had destroyed a T 90 tank using a 125mm anti-tank gun. More recently, in January 2021, a video emerged online showing a Ukrainian drone targeting and destroying a T 90 tank near the Ukrainian border with Russia.
While it is difficult to verify the accuracy of these reports, it is clear that T 90 tanks have been deployed in significant numbers by Russian-backed separatist forces in eastern Ukraine. These tanks have been used to support ground offensives and to counter Ukrainian military operations. As such, they have become a prominent symbol of Russia’s military involvement in the conflict.
In sum, while it is difficult to verify the exact number of T 90 tanks destroyed in Ukraine, there is evidence to suggest that they have been targeted and damaged by Ukrainian military forces. The use of these tanks by Russian-backed separatist forces highlights the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the ongoing tensions between Russia and its neighbors.
Is Su-35 better than F-35?
Comparing the Su-35 and the F-35 is not an easy task, as both aircraft are designed with different goals in mind. The Su-35 is a fourth-generation fighter jet developed by Russia’s Sukhoi company, while the F-35, also known as the Joint Strike Fighter, is a fifth-generation stealth fighter designed by the United States.
The Su-35 is known for its superior maneuverability, with its impressive thrust-to-weight ratio and advanced avionics providing unparalleled control over the aircraft. Its long-range radar and missile systems also give it a considerable advantage in air-to-air combat. Additionally, the Su-35 can reach supersonic speeds without the use of afterburners, giving it a significant edge in terms of fuel efficiency and overall performance.
On the other hand, the F-35 is one of the world’s most advanced stealth fighters, designed to evade detection by radar and other electronic systems. Its advanced avionics systems allow it to gather and process data from a wide range of sources, providing the pilot with a comprehensive view of the battlefield.
The F-35 is also designed to be highly versatile, with the ability to operate in a variety of roles, including air-to-air and air-to-ground combat.
However, the F-35 has been plagued by cost overruns and technical issues, which have limited its effectiveness in certain situations. Meanwhile, the Su-35 has been deployed successfully in various conflicts, including the Syrian Civil War, where it has demonstrated its impressive capabilities in both air-to-air and air-to-ground combat.
The question of whether the Su-35 is better than the F-35 is difficult to answer definitively. While the Su-35 may have certain advantages in terms of performance and maneuverability, the F-35’s advanced stealth capabilities and versatility make it a valuable asset in modern warfare. the effectiveness of each aircraft will depend on the particular situation in which it is deployed and the tactics employed by its pilots.
Which is better MiG 35 vs Su-35?
The MiG 35 is a multirole fighter aircraft that was introduced in 2007 by the Russian manufacturer Mikoyan. It is an advanced variant of the MiG 29M/M2 and is equipped with the latest avionics, onboard systems, and weapons. It has a maximum takeoff weight of 24,500 kg and can reach speeds of Mach 2.25.
The aircraft can carry a variety of weapons, including air-to-air missiles, air-to-surface missiles, and precision-guided bombs. It can also carry a 30mm GSh-30-1 cannon that can fire up to 1500 rounds per minute.
On the other hand, the Su-35 is also a multirole fighter aircraft built by the Russian manufacturer Sukhoi. The aircraft has been in service since 2014 and is an improved variant of the Su-27. It has a maximum takeoff weight of 34,500 kg and can reach speeds of Mach 2.25. Like the MiG 35, it can carry a range of weapons, including air-to-air missiles, air-to-surface missiles, and bombs.
It is also equipped with a 30mm cannon, the GSh-30-1, which has a firing rate of up to 1800 rounds per minute.
When it comes to comparing the two aircraft, both have similar specifications and capabilities. However, there are some differences that can affect the aircraft’s overall performance in various situations. For example, the MiG 35 has a smaller footprint and is more maneuverable than the Su-35. It is also easier to maintain and requires less maintenance than the Su-35.
On the other hand, the Su-35 has a longer range than the MiG 35, making it a better choice for long-range missions. It is also more heavily armed and can carry a larger payload than the MiG 35, making it more suitable for air-to-ground missions.
Both the MiG 35 and Su-35 are excellent aircraft, and choosing the superior one would depend on the specific requirements of the mission and the types of tasks that need to be performed. Therefore, both aircraft have their strengths and weaknesses, and the final decision would be based on the mission objectives and the needs of the operator.
